Striking the Roots of COVERT-1984 Tom Cowan's book breaks the "Germ Spell"

by Leland Lehrman

Reading Tom Cowan's new book The Contagion Myth I feel as if a spell has been broken. In the book, Tom shows that the original Louis Pasteur germ theory studies were failures. Princeton Professor Gerard Geison demonstrated there was fraud in the experimental process by 1914. Geison got a hold of these studies because a grandson violated the terms of Pasteur's will and released the original notebooks into the public domain. Since then, it has been possible to understand Pasteur's failure to demonstrate:

1. the truth of germ theory and
2. the effectiveness of vaccination.

As I read, I kept wondering who were Pasteur's contemporary sponsors, and were they aware that he and the germ theory were fraudulent? He certainly gave them a powerful weapon in the arsenal of population management, and his refusal to make his notebooks public after his death is suspicious. Is that the reason he "became the celebrity scientist of his time, feted by kings and prime ministers, and hailed as a great scientist?" The question occurs: if Fauci and Gates are the current medical foils for the global eugenics for profit agenda, who were Pasteur's patrons? From at least the 18th century, mandatory vaccination has been on someone's agenda, as Jaganath Chatterjee's excellent history of vaccination, and the studies he cites in the footnotes make painfully clear.

The critical pages in Cowan's book are from 3-7 in the first chapter. If anything makes it clear that vaccinations cannot ever even theoretically be effective, this book does it more quickly and finally than everything else I have seen. It is, in fact, so conclusive, so final, that I could not wait to bring it to everyone's attention and submit this proposal:

That a formal convention of independent international scientists be called to review:

1. The evidence that the germ theory of disease causation is demonstrably false.

2. The evidence that no vaccination can possibly be effective because vaccine effectiveness requires that the germ theory of disease be true.

3. The political implications of the above.

Here I quote some of the nails in the coffin of germ theory that Tom hammers into place:

"...[T]his book's central claim is that no disease attributed to bacteria and viruses has met all of Koch's postulates or all of Rivers' criteria. This is not because the postulates are incorrect or obsolete (in fact, they are entirely logical) but rather because bacteria and viruses don't cause disease, at least not in any way we currently understand... p. 4

Pasteur passed his laboratory notebooks along to his heirs with the provision that they never made the notebooks public. However, his grandson, Louis Pasteur Vallery-Rador, who apparently didn't care for Pasteur much, donated the notebooks to the French national library, which published them. In 1914, Professor Gerard Geison of Princeton University published an analysis of these notebooks, which revealed that Pasteur had committed massive fraud in all his studies. For instance, when he said that he injected virulent anthrax spores into vaccinated and unvaccinated animals, he could trumpet the fact that the unvaccinated animals died, but that was because he also injected the unvaccinated animals with poisons.

In the notebooks, Pasteur states unequivocally that he was unable to transfer disease with a pure culture of bacteria...

He admitted that the whole effort to prove contagion was a failure, leading to his famous deathbed confession: 'The germ is nothing; the terrain is everything.'

Since Pasteur's day, no one has demonstrated experimentally the transmissibility of disease with pure cultures of bacteria or viruses." p. 6-7

The second chapter of the book is similarly comprehensive and final, introducing the role of electricity and wireless frequencies in causing historic pandemics as well as the current situation. In that chapter, drawing on Arthur Firstenberg's The Invisible Rainbow, a great deal of evidence is put forward demonstrating that the linkage between 5G rollouts and COVERT-1984 symptoms is way more than just incidental to Wuhan and New York City.

This issue brings up one of the few major differences of opinion I have seen in the health freedom community.

I was surprised when CHD's Dafna Tachover contradicted the idea that there is a linkage between 5G and "coronavirus," given she and CHD concede the correlation between 5G, EMF and influenza in general. After reading Tom's book, I consider her assertions and Tom's irreconcilable, and therefore an important opportunity for the interests of truth. Since some of the key evidence in Tom's book comes from the censored paper by M. Fioranelli et al regarding the relationship between 5G and "coronaviruses," you may perhaps wish to look at it yourself.
Again, this calls for an international conference to discuss. Has a replacement for the Royal Society, the Smithsonian or whatever is current in the US come forward? If not let's create one.

Is it not time to call for such a scientific convention?

I am reminded of the last time a massive shift in medicine actually went in a good direction: during and after the time of Paracelsus. Paracelsus is widely considered a founding father of evidence-based medicine and chemistry. Importantly he included spiritual and psychosomatic factors in both. He opposed dogmatic diagnosis and treatment from authority, whether it be Church, State, or Academy. Fiercely independent and successful as a healer, a revolutionary advocate of teaching and writing in the vernacular, he was continuously attacked by jealous contemporaries. Nearly 500 years ago in 1527, Paracelsus responded by publicly burning Avicenna's Canon of Medicine. Along with Galen's works, the Canon was the only medical text approved by the Inquisition. A prolific writer, he left behind him records of a medical profession as corrupt then as it is now.

A few choice remarks will serve to connect us across the centuries. Many of them may strike us as personally relevant.

"I am different, let this not upset you...

This is my vow:

To perfect my medical art and never to swerve from it so long as God grants me my office, and to oppose all false medicine and teachings. Then, to love the sick, each and all of them, more than if my own body were at stake. Not to judge anything superficially...not to administer any medicine without understanding, nor to collect any money without earning it. Not to trust any apothecary, nor to do violence to any child. Not to guess, but to know...

The art of medicine does not cry out against me, for it is imperishable and established upon foundations so imperishable that heaven and earth shall pass away before the art of medicine shall die. And since the art of medicine leaves me at peace, why should I be perturbed by the outcries of mortal physicians, who cry only because I overthrow and wound them? ...They are more eager to obscure their own errors than to fight on behalf of what the patients need...But since such useless rabble befoul the art of medicine with their bungling, and seek nothing but their own profit, what can it avail that I admonish them to love? I for my part am ashamed of medicine, considering what an utter fraud it has come to be...I do not take my medicines from the apothecaries; their shops are but foul sculleries, from which comes nothing but foul broths. As for you, (the medical profession) you defend your kingdom with belly-crawling and flattery. How long do you think this will last?" *

Today we are facing another crisis of offical dogma and punishment-based social manipulation. Tom's book is not just a voice in the wilderness, but a sunbeam illuminating and healing the moldy offices of ignorance.

Thank you Tom, for your courage and clarity. Your work recalls Paracelsus in many ways, of whom it was said that when he "entered a sick person's home, it was as if a fresh wind blew through the house, and his presence made all darkness disappear around the sickbed."

Reading Tom's book, that's how I feel.

With love and a fresh wind for all,

R. Leland Lehrman

* Paracelsus, Selected Writings edited by Jolande Jacobi with a Preface from Carl Jung, pages 1-7 "Credo."

Afterword and Acknowledgments: I was motivated to learn about Paracelsus by the works of John Maxson Stillman, a relative on my mother's side, who left an excellent work from his own hand on Paracelsus in my great uncle Leland's possession. My mother has been the quiet guardian of his effects since his suicide. My family names their members Leland after Leland Stanford, for whom John Maxson's ancestor worked as physician and who founded Stanford University. John Maxson wrote his book while at Stanford as Professor of Chemistry, Emeritus. Paracelsus had also come up several times in the Foundation Studies in Anthroposophy course at the Alkion Teacher Training, and so I was predisposed to select this book from the storage boxes in the basement of our family home in Pennsylvania. During the same time period, I visited with members of the Golden Rosy Cross temple in Chatham, NY. I am grateful to Herbert Horn for giving me his edition of the book Gnosis, Rays of Light Past and Present in which I found a few other choice selections on Paracelsus worth recounting. Although the current eugenics scenario was unimaginable in Paracelsus' time, there were equally terrifying possibilities. In Gnosis, author Peter F.W. Huijs does us all a service by dissecting the social underbelly of "Inquisitions" in a passage on page 147. It is important to keep in mind his other observation on page 156 that the medical class was (and may still be judging from the trust now placed in them) "the most important class after the aristocracy."

"In the Europe of that time...a group of people existed who held sway over religious ideas and practice [and] kept the population quiet and under control with the assurance of a heaven after this life and by threatening them, whenever necessary, with hell.

How was it possible that the people of the Middle Ages and those first years of the Renaissance could believe so unconditionally in, and be subject to, these invisible influences, and how could they accept being treated in such a way by those in power? What fears afflicted people to such an extent that they did not dare to say what they thought, even recoiling from their own thoughts?

...Perhaps it is even better to ask how it could have been possible that large sections of the population - until recently - were so superstitious that they were of the opinion that witches had to be burned...Or was it, perhaps, not fear but greed that motivated them? According to the surviving documents, the money and goods of heretics and witches were declared forfeit and, after deductions of the costs of jail accommodations, professional torturers' salaries, and henchmen's fees, fell to the Church, the accusers, the judges, the physicians, the jailers, and even (in a highly exceptional case) to the lawyer of the accused.

...It is also not surprising that when the Emperor of Austria awarded the forfeited properties to himself and nothing remained to be gained by the city councilors, they discontinued their witch hunts, to resume them again when the emperor rescinded his right. When Emperor Ferdinand II (1619-1637) declared this confiscation unlawful and prohibited it, the witch burnings stopped altogether."

This history reveals in the starkest possible terms what may be the tried and true methods and motivations of COVERT-1984, which clearly goes back much farther than George Orwell, and unfortunately does not involve protection or health at all.